Justifying Reproductive Cloning For Logistical Motives Essay

Justifying Reproductive Cloning for Logistical Motives In this age of technology and innovation, what was once science fiction is now becoming a reality. Human reproductive cloning is on the forefront for providing prospective parents with a new mode of reproduction. However, with the concept of reproductive cloning comes an unprecedented set of ethical issues. Issues especially focused on how cloning may affect the child’s right to an open future are highlighted by philosophers such as Dena Davis. Davis takes a neutral stance on reproductive cloning and argues that it is morally impermissible when used for duplicative motives, but permissible when used for logistical motives. Duplicative motives are when â€Å"the genetic replication itself†¦ is the attraction† (Davis 160) and the parents wish for their child to be a mere copy of their donor. Logistical motivations are when the parents’ end goal â€Å"is simply to have a child† that is genetically related (Davis 159). Davis leaves the evaluation of such parental motives in the hands of healthcare professionals. Philosophers McGee and Wilmut add to Davis’ position, but call for a more holistic evaluation of parental motives and competency by following an adoption model. In this paper, I will support Davis’ argument on the moral permissibility of reproductive cloning under logistical motivations by addressing the main concerns that surround reproductive cloning. First, I shall reconstruct Davis’ argument in favor of reproductive cloning

The United States And The Civil Rights Crisis - 898 Words

The United States of America has the largest prison system in the world with over 2.2 million prisoners. 1,320,000 of those prisoners are blacks and hispanics. The justice system in the United States has unequal outcomes across racial groups. Although together they make up only 30% of the country’s population, black and hispanic men are 3 times more likely to end up behind bars for the same crime committed by white males, allowing them to make up 60% of the prison population. Private prisons, the War on Drugs and a civil rights crisis and are the main factors to why people of color are overrepresented in our prison systems. Private prisons continuously buy prisons in states all across the US. Once they buy these prisons and a contract is†¦show more content†¦This leads to a plethora of men and women being stopped constantly for no reason. Often a civilian is stopped solely on the basis of their skin color/stereotypes. To work properly, private prisons require full prisons as aforementioned, and the least expensive prisoner as possible. The 2012 ACLU report , relates that â€Å"it costs $68,270 to support a prisoner age 50 or older compared with $34,135 per year to house a non-geriatric prisoner† (ACLU,2012). In their contracts private prisons exempt themselves from having to accept older prisoners. This is why young men of color are filling up these private prisons in record numbers. Modern day prison systems guarantee monetary security for the corporations, rather than protect the public and rehabilitate the inmates. President Richard Nixon first used the term â€Å"The War on Drugs† in 1971. Since then little to nothing has been accomplished to stop drug use, trade and distribution. The Drug business is a multi-billion dollar enterprise that continues to thrive. A federal study conducted by â€Å"Monitoring the Future† reports that 85% of high school students found marijuana easy to obtain. (Williams,2011). Many believe it is nonsensical to spend billions of dollars on arrest of small time offenders who commit non-violent crimes, when in over 45 years nothing has improved. Initially, Federal law mandates five years in prison without possibility of parole for possession of 5 grams of crack or 3.5 ounces of heroin.

Tillie OlsenS free essay sample

Tillie Olsen? S # 8220 ; I Stand Here Ironing # 8221 ; And Alice Walker? S # 8220 ; Everyday Use # 8221 ; Essay, Research Paper Love and Acceptance Tillie Olsen? s I Stand Here Ironing, and Alice Walker? s Everyday Use, both address the issue of a female parent? s guilt over how her kids turn out. Both female parents blamed themselves for their girl? s jobs. While I Stand Here Ironing is evidently about the mousey girl, in Everyday Use this is camouflaged by the fact most of the action and duologue involves the female parent and older sister Dee. Neither does the female parent in Everyday Use say outright that she feels guilty, but we catch a glance of it when Dee is seeking really hard to claim the handmade comforters. The female parent says she did something she had neer done before, # 8220 ; hugged Maggie to me, # 8221 ; so took the comforters from Dee and gave them to Maggie. We will write a custom essay sample on Tillie OlsenS or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In I Stand Here Ironing the female parent tells us she feels guilty for the manner her girl Emily is, for the things she ( the female parent ) did and did non make. The female parent? s neighbor even tells her she should # 8220 ; smiling at Emily more when you look at her. # 8221 ; Again towards the terminal of the narrative Emily? s female parent admits # 8220 ; my wisdom came excessively late. # 8221 ; The female parents unwittingly gave Emily and Maggie 2nd best. Both female parents compare their two girls to each other. In Everyday Use the female parent tells us that # 8220 ; Dee is lighter than Maggie, with nicer hair and a Fuller figure. # 8221 ; She Fahning -2-speaks of the fire that burned and scarred Maggie. She tells us how Maggie is non bright, how she shuffles when she walks. Comparing her with Dee whose pess vwere ever neat-looking, as if God himself had shaped them. # 8221 ; We besides learn of Dee? s # 8220 ; manner # 8221 ; and the manner she awes the other misss at school with it. The female parent in I Stand Here Ironing speaks of Susan, # 8220 ; speedy and articulate and buttocks ured, everything in visual aspect and mode Emily was not.† Emily â€Å"thin and dark and foreign-looking at a clip when every small miss was supposed to look or believe she should look a chubby blonde reproduction of Shirley Temple.† Like Dee, Emily had a physical restriction besides. Hers was asthma. Both Emily and Maggie show resentment towards their sisters. The sisters who God rewarded with good expressions and poise. Emily? s female parent points out the # 8220 ; toxicant feeling # 8221 ; between the sisters, feelings she contributed to by her inability to equilibrate the # 8220 ; injuries and needs # 8221 ; of the two. In Everyday Use we see Maggie # 8220 ; eying her sister with a mixture of enviousness and awe. She thinks her sister has held life ever in the thenar of one manus, that # 8220 ; no # 8221 ; is a word the universe would neer state to her. # 8221 ; Maggie? s female parent seems to hold reinforced this by being unable to state no to Dee besides. This is what makes the point in the narrative when she eventually does state no ( sing the comforters ) such an of import minute in Maggie? s life. The attitude of the female parents towards the polished girls boundary lines on disdain. I believe this is more apparent in Everyday Use, demonstrated by the dream of the Television show. Besides the description of Dee reading to them, # 8220 ; burned us with a batch of cognition we Fahning -3-didn? t needfully necessitate to cognize, # 8221 ; and once more when she shoved # 8220 ; us off # 8230 ; like dimwits. # 8221 ; It? s besides pointed out that Dee and Susan are egoistic and selfish while Maggie and Emily are caring and giving. I think in the terminal both of the female parents realize their girls are okay the manner they are. They come to accept their girls restrictions and care for their quiet gifts. Not everyone can be polished and successful in secular ways. Possibly that? s why Maggie was smiling in the terminal, her female parent eventually accepted her as is.

Lucas V South Essay Research Paper Lucas free essay sample

Lucas V. South Essay, Research Paper Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council Charles Adams Problem: David H. Lucas purchased two beach front tonss on Isle of Palms in Charleston county in 1986 for 900,000 with purpose to subsequently construct one individual household place on each batch. The undermentioned twelvemonth when South Carolina conducted a study of the seashore line the rustlings showed that the beaches of South Carolina were critically gnawing. Due to the rustlings of the study South Carolina issued the Beachfront Management Act ( BMA ) . The act placed restraints on the use of land along the seashore line, and because the edifice line was moved inward Lucas # 8217 ; tonss were affected with no exclusions provided. When he bought those tonss the twelvemonth before that peculiar zone was non required to hold a license to construct. When Lucas went to construct the proper licenses were non given due to the BMA, and his tonss were deemed 95 % worthless. We will write a custom essay sample on Lucas V South Essay Research Paper Lucas or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Torahs: The Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 Passed in order to protect the state coastline from eroding. The South Carolina Coastal Zone Management Act of 1977 Passed in order to protect the shoreline from eroding, preserve the beach and dune systems, and forestall farther coastal harm. And said that before building could take topographic point in any designated, environmentally sensitive # 8220 ; critical country # 8221 ; an proprietor had to obtain permission from the South Carolina Coastal Council. The South Carolina Beachfront Management Act of 1988 Passed to further implement the South Carolina Coastal Zone Management Act of 1977, and widen the # 8220 ; critical country # 8221 ; farther inland. Case: Lucas submitted his suit to the South Carolina tribunal of Common Pleas, and sued, avering that the Beachfront Management Act of 1988 had effected a pickings of the value of his belongings without merely compensation. The tribunal agreed that Lucas had suffered a entire loss of the value of his belongings and concluded that regulative taking had occurred. On entreaty, the South Carolina Supreme Court revised the determination, on the evidences that the BMA had been passed to forestall serious injury to the populace. Lucas petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to reexamine the instance and the Court sided with Lucas stating that the Beachfront Management Act of 1988 had non been designed to profit the province in obtaining land for public usage, but was to forestall injury to the populace. The Court ruled that Lucas suffered a pickings, and that his belongings was rendered valueless by South Carolina statue and that he was entitled to merely compensation as stated in the fifth and 1 4 diamonds of our Fundamental law. Significance: Although the South Carolina Supreme Court decided that province ordinances were designed to forestall serious public injury, the U.S. Supreme Court held that when a belongings proprietor suffered a pickings, there were no exclusions from common regulation ( the Takings Clause and the merely Compensation Clause ) . Furthermore, when the province of South Carolina amended its original legislative act by including commissariats that might allow limited building, the U.S. Supreme Court held that belongings proprietors must still be compensated. Even when statute law subsequently renders the initial act less restrictive, belongings proprietors still suffer from the original effects of a pickings, therefore, merely compensation must be rende ruddy. ( Mikula 518 ) Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council Charles Adams Problem: David H. Lucas purchased two beach front tonss on Isle of Palms in Charleston county in 1986 for 900,000 with purpose to subsequently construct one individual household place on each batch. The undermentioned twelvemonth when South Carolina conducted a study of the seashore line the rustlings showed that the beaches of South Carolina were critically gnawing. Due to the rustlings of the study South Carolina issued the Beachfront Management Act ( BMA ) . The act placed restraints on the use of land along the seashore line, and because the edifice line was moved inward Lucas # 8217 ; tonss were affected with no exclusions provided. When he bought those tonss the twelvemonth before that peculiar zone was non required to hold a license to construct. When Lucas went to construct the proper licenses were non given due to the BMA, and his tonss were deemed 95 % worthless. Torahs: The Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 Passed in order to protect the state coastline from eroding. The South Carolina Coastal Zone Management Act of 1977 Passed in order to protect the shoreline from eroding, preserve the beach and dune systems, and forestall farther coastal harm. And said that before building could take topographic point in any designated, environmentally sensitive # 8220 ; critical country # 8221 ; an proprietor had to obtain permission from the South Carolina Coastal Council. The South Carolina Beachfront Management Act of 1988 Passed to further implement the South Carolina Coastal Zone Management Act of 1977, and widen the # 8220 ; critical country # 8221 ; farther inland. Case: Lucas submitted his suit to the South Carolina tribunal of Common Pleas, and sued, avering that the Beachfront Management Act of 1988 had effected a pickings of the value of his belongings without merely compensation. The tribunal agreed that Lucas had suffered a entire loss of the value of his belongings and concluded that regulative taking had occurred. On entreaty, the South Carolina Supreme Court revised the determination, on the evidences that the BMA had been passed to forestall serious injury to the populace. Lucas petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to reexamine the instance and the Court sided with Lucas stating that the Beachfront Management Act of 1988 had non been designed to profit the province in obtaining land for public usage, but was to forestall injury to the populace. The Court ruled that Lucas suffered a pickings, and that his belongings was rendered valueless by South Carolina statue and that he was entitled to merely compensation as stated in the fifth and 1 4 diamonds of our Fundamental law. Significance: Although the South Carolina Supreme Court decided that province ordinances were designed to forestall serious public injury, the U.S. Supreme Court held that when a belongings proprietor suffered a pickings, there were no exclusions from common regulation ( the Takings Clause and the merely Compensation Clause ) . Furthermore, when the province of South Carolina amended its original legislative act by including commissariats that might allow limited building, the U.S. Supreme Court held that belongings proprietors must still be compensated. Even when statute law subsequently renders the initial act less restrictive, belongings proprietors still suffer from the original effects of a pickings, therefore, merely compensation must be rendered. ( Mikula 518 )

Sample Essay on Natural Disasters

Sample Essay on Natural DisastersWhen you take a look at the phrase, 'sample essay on natural disasters,' what comes to mind? Most of us remember the stories we heard in our schools about children who died as a result of losing their lives in these freak natural disasters. The tragedies are truly horrific and even though we may not be affected by such phenomena as earthquakes, tornadoes, typhoons, and so on, we should definitely know what to do when there is an accident or a disaster that affects our lives.In order to learn how to write a sample essay on natural disasters, first you must be able to look at an actual disaster. The best way to do this is to talk to people who have suffered from such a problem in the past.However, writing a sample essay on natural disasters doesn't end there. You also need to go online and read samples of how the lives of those who have lost their lives can be regained and other forms of tragedies that could strike you.After you have read through severa l samples, you will be able to decide if you want to actually write the essay yourself or not. If you decide to do it yourself, then make sure that you use more than one example so that you have a wide variety of examples to choose from.Next, you need to decide on the format of the essay. In most cases, you will need to have a subject of your essay. For example, if you're writing about a natural disaster, you might want to use a story about how a school was closed due to a hurricane or flood, or how a person lost his life due to a tornado.Furthermore, you need to give details about the particular disaster, such as the names of the victims, the events that led to the disaster, and details of the victims. You also need to provide information about the circumstances surrounding the disaster such as who was responsible for the mishap, how the problem happened, the root cause, and the good and bad effects.All in all, writing a sample essay on natural disasters should not be too much of a difficult task. With the information and examples provided, you will be able to write an essay that will be as compelling as the one on how to handle a negotiation with your boss.

Time I Was Judged Unfairly free essay sample

Wally Treated and Judged unfairly There was a time back in grade school when I was people had the unjust judgment of who I am as a person because I was a little different from everyone else. I have always been bigger in size than most people and that hasnt changed today. I would wear different attire than other people because of the area I grew up in and the size of me. I would also be into hip hop music because of who I grew up with; however, I was the only one that only listened to hip hop because everyone was raised to not sites to the language they spoke In those songs.When I was a kid and didnt dress or look like everyone else it would be difficult for me to be included in some groups either out of fear by some of the smaller kids or flat out disgust at me being the biggest guy in the class. We will write a custom essay sample on Time I Was Judged Unfairly or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page I am still a husky guy to this day; however, I am going to try to cut down a lot because I feel In this society today you have to be thin or average to be accepted. Unfortunately have become less and less happy with my weight and appearance ND its caused me to doubt myself and has hindered some of the better times of my life.There are always facts about America being the most obese country in the world and I see many health commercials that are concerned with child obesity. I hated being Judged because of my weight, especially when I was in grade school and it caused me to react in the wrong way by becoming a tough guy. This attitude I developed almost cost me my catholic education. Despite this, I did find a way to Just hold back and finish my catholic education. The clothes I would wear would be all loose on me which again wasnt the way everyone dressed in shirts that they said fit but to me seemed tight.On dress down days I would wear my baggy clothes and see the odd stares from classmates who wore there preppy clothes that fit and wasnt that lose. The shorts I would wear would be a little ghetto In the sense they pretty far past my knees and I would rarely wear cargo shorts. There was an African American teen influence in my style because I would hang out with them at times in my neighborhood of Tycoon. If someone made a remark about me I would get angry with them and shove them or do something immature which caused more people to judge me before they know me.The music that I listen to now Is such a drastic change from when I was kid which has helped me fit in during social events or parties. When I use to be unfairly judged I would be listening to hip hop music and the language could not be comprehended by kids in my class. They would be listening to the rock music that I did like but didnt always listen to because I was raised listening to hip hop. I still love some hip hop music as I did when I was kid but as of now I listen to everything from rock to house/techno music. The crazy thing Is the kids that unfairly Judged me before who I I have been listening to since a child. Being unfairly Judged would dampen my mood a lot when I was younger because I took the Judgments of others as me being wrong. I havent noticed any unfair judgment as I got older because I dont think I really care much about it anymore besides my weight problem. Everyone that has matured from those days still make ekes here and there about things I may wear or my weight but I Just try to laugh it off because I know Vie come a long way since wearing the really baggy clothes and long shorts.I believe that in this society most of people very shallow because you rarely see a very attractive girl with a heavier guy or someone who dresses oddly, however it is the same way for guys who are the typical size and wear the dress clothes. I was unfairly Judged when I was a kid and maybe I still am now, despite this, I find myself doing the same exact thing to others by being very shallow which I know I need to change.

humans and Frogs

The two organisms discussed I this report are humans and Frogs. The Taxonomy of an organism includes kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species. Humans are classified by the kingdom animalia, phylum chordate, class mammalia, order primates, family hominidae, genus homo, and species homo sapiens. Frogs are classified as kingdom animalia, phylum chordate, and genus and species Rana pipens. A frogs habitat is usually spent on land for most of its adult life. However frogs reproduction and development must take place in water or in a moist place. Some adaptations frogs have that aid in their survival are having thin skin that contains mucus-secreting glands. Also they have two pairs of limbs, which can be used for swimming, jumping or walking. The anatomy of a frog is very similar to the anatomy of humans. Both humans and frogs have the same kinds of organs and systems of organs. Digestion in a frog begins in the mouth. Although the frog has teeth, they are basically useless. The frogs tongue however is very important. Most of the time the tongue is folded back toward the throat. From here the frog is able to flick out the tongue very fast to catch its prey. The tongue is also very sticky. From the frogs mouth food passes into the stomach by the esophagus. From there the food moves into the small intestine. This is where most of the digestion takes place. There are large digestive glands, the liver and the pancreas, which are attached by ducts. Liquid wastes from the kidneys go through the ureters to the urinary bladder. Solid wastes from the large intestine go into the cloaca. Both the liquid and solid wastes leave the body through the cloaca. The digestive system in humans is much more complicated. ! In humans digestion beings in the mouth. Once food enters the mouth chewing and saliva starts to break it up and make it easier to swallow. Then the food goes down through the esophagus to the stoma...